{"id":3944,"date":"2023-04-28T15:09:20","date_gmt":"2023-04-28T13:09:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/?p=3944"},"modified":"2023-05-25T18:01:37","modified_gmt":"2023-05-25T16:01:37","slug":"meta-utilitarianism-a-holistic-view-on-maximising-value","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/2023\/04\/28\/meta-utilitarianism-a-holistic-view-on-maximising-value\/","title":{"rendered":"Meta-Utilitarianism: A holistic view on maximising value"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"
Source: Stephen Bittel<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Transcending the tension between Consequentialism and the Categorical Imperative<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

Philosophy is often a subject that people make fun of: Philosophising is sometimes viewed as crunching one\u2019s brain over seemingly irrelevant topics with no practical outcome. While I perceive philosophy to be vitally useful to gain insight into our own ways of thinking and behaving<\/a>, I recently had a thought which I think may explain part of why philosophy has this dusty reputation: Philosophy \u2013 as opposed to most other subjects we learn about in school or study at university \u2013 evolves only marginally. When we learn about philosophy, we read about Plato, Socrates, Kant & Co \u2013 all people who lived hundreds or even thousands of years ago and whose ideas have been built upon since. These newer ideas are mostly lost in some digitals drawers of students or published in academic papers which never seem to see the light of a school lesson. Learning about philosophy is as if we learned in physics class that the world consisted of the 5 elements<\/a> instead of atoms, which, in turn, consist of quarks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Utilitarianism is such an example. It refers to a philosophical concept, which was first systematically described by Jeremy Bentham (*1748 – \u20201832) and John Stuart Mill (*1806 – \u20201873). I am sure I am not the first person who comes up with this \u2013 and I am at this point admittedly too lazy to search through the jungle of academic papers \u2013 but I would like to build upon this concept and call it meta-utilitarianism<\/em><\/strong>. Why would I engage in such an effort? Because I have been a meta-utilitarian since I can think and even knew about this concept.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Assuming you haven’t already closed the tab and have faith in me that this isn\u2019t just another dusty philosophy lesson, let\u2019s start with looking at the original definition of utilitarianism:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cUtilitarianism is an ethical theory that determines right from wrong by focusing on outcomes [of actions & choices]. [\u2026] Utilitarianism holds that the most ethical choice is the one that will produce the greatest good [i.e. utility] for the greatest number [of people].\u201d<\/em><\/p>\u2013 Definition of Utilitarianism<\/a><\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The fact that \u2013 in the original definition of utilitarianism \u2013 the focus is set solely on the outcomes of an action, and not on the choice of the means, makes utilitarianism a form of Consequentialism<\/strong><\/em>. Consequences are what matters when judging the ethical value of an action. The opposite of consequentialism is the Categorical Imperative<\/strong><\/em>, which determines an action as right or wrong, based on moral duty, without taking the consequences into account. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

To understand the difference, let\u2019s look at the famous Trolley Problem:<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a>
The Trolley Problem (Source: Wikipedia<\/a>, McGeddon<\/a>, CC BY-SA 4.0<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

\u201d<\/em>The most basic version of the dilemma, known as “Bystander at the Switch” or “Switch”, goes:

There is a runaway trolley barreling down the railway tracks. Ahead, on the tracks, there are five people tied up and unable to move. The trolley is headed straight for them. You are standing some distance off in the train yard, next to a lever. If you pull this lever, the trolley will switch to a different set of tracks. However, you notice that there is one person on the side track. You have two (and only two) options:

1. Do nothing, in which case the trolley will kill the five people on the main track.
2. Pull the lever, diverting the trolley onto the side track where it will kill one person.

Which is the more ethical option? Or, more simply: What is the right thing to do?”
<\/p>\u2013 The Trolley Problem<\/a><\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"
The modified Trolley Problem (Source<\/a>)<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

What pops up in your mind first with respect to what you would have chosen? Do you belong to the around 90% of people who would choose to kill the one person over five? Arguably, here the choice is rather easy (assuming none of these people mean anything to you). However, Harvard professor Michael Sandel illustrates<\/a> that the choice becomes much harder if the problem is slightly modified: Suppose, you perceive exactly the same situation as before, but instead of coincidentally standing next to the lever, you find yourself on top of a bridge where the trolley will pass under in a moment before hitting the five people. There is no other track this time. Besides you stands a fat man (no body shaming intended) leaning over the railing. You know (suppose with absolute certainty) that if you push the man he will fall right onto the track and will will push the train off the rail. The man dies, the 5 people on the other track survive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The consequences of the modified trolley problem are exactly the same as the ones from the original one: In making the decision to pull the lever\/ to push the fat man over the railing, only one person dies instead of five. And yet \u2013 the number of people who would push the man off the bridge is significantly lower than those who would pull the lever. This modification exposes the difference between consequentialism and the categorical imperative; While the consequences (with respect to the number of people dying) are the same, we generally feel so bad about actively killing somebody that we choose the passive choice of letting four more people die.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This sort of dilemma \u2013 the tension between consequentialism and the categorical imperative \u2013 attracts the largest part of criticism against utilitarianism. At the end of the day, we are not just some kind of machines, which make an (instrumentally) rational calculation about how many lives to save. We are human beings and our feelings about the way we reach a certain outcome also matters, i.e. has an effect on us.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Transcending the tension between Consequentialism and the Categorical Imperative<\/u><\/strong><\/u><\/strong><\/u><\/strong><\/u><\/strong><\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Okay, now we can choose to whine about this dilemma and present it as such until the end of time or we can transcend it. This solution is pretty simple: Since our feelings towards the means we use to reach an outcome have an effect on us, why not factor these effects into the outcome, when we make the calculation what consequences our actions will bring about? This is actually what we do anyways already (consciously or not) when evaluating the consequences of our action. As described in the article on how we take action<\/a>, psychological effects, such as the sunk cost effect, skew how we feel about the outcome. Voil\u00e0 \u2013 the tension between categorical imperative and consequentialism is transcended. Now consider not only the benefit for yourself and others, but also the environment<\/a>. This opens up a holistic view on the consequences of one\u2019s actions. And this is what I call meta-utilitarianism:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cMeta-utilitarianism holds that the most ethical choice is the one that will produce the greatest good (value\/utility) for the greatest impact on people and the environment.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\u2013 Meta-Utilitarianism<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

So far so good. Since this was really a rather easy exercise, please don\u2019t quote me on this, but rather find those academic papers which may already describe something like meta-utilitarianism. All I want to do with this article is to advocate for meta-utilitarianism, because I feel if more people valued the greatest good for the greatest impact, we would make less short-sighted and less selfish decisions. Suppose you figure you can take action A or B. Both cost the same amount of energy\/ resources, but action B makes more people happy. Generally speaking, wouldn\u2019t it make you feel better choosing action B? Suppose Action B included a small sacrifice for you, but a much bigger benefit for the other people \u2013 a utilitarian would still choose action B. A true (meta-)utilitarian does not do this based on some extrinsic motivation<\/a>, but identified motivation \u2013 because it feels like the right thing to do<\/a>. The value to maximise the greater good is integrated in a utilitarian\u2019s motivational system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Note that (meta-) utilitarianism is different to altruism:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThere exists a wide range of philosophical views on humans’ obligations or motivations to act altruistically. Proponents of ethical altruism maintain that individuals are morally obligated to act altruistically. The opposing view is ethical egoism, which maintains that moral agents should always act in their own self-interest. Both ethical altruism and ethical egoism contrast with utilitarianism, which maintains that each agent should act in order to maximise the efficacy of their function and the benefit to both themselves and their co-inhabitants.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\u2013 Difference between altruism and utilitarianism; Wikipedia<\/a><\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Isn’t (Meta-) Utilitarianism too demanding?<\/u><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The short answer is: No \u2013 Just do the best you can do considering the information you have and your (timely) constraints. The longer answer lies in the following paragraphs:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

You may find (meta-)utilitarianism more appealing than altruism, because with the former attitude you also take your own interests into account. (Meta-)utilitarianism is less demanding than altruism, in that we do not need to deny our own feelings or desires. And yet, there is criticism that utilitarianism may be too demanding<\/a>. First of all, our rationality is bounded<\/a>, which means that our ability to make (subconscious) calculations of the consequences of our actions is limited. Second, in practice, we hardly have the chance to get perfect information<\/a> to base our calculations on. Third, making sacrifices to increase the value for others may be exhausting in the long run.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, raising these three points as criticism against utilitarianism begs the question: Is there a better alternative to utilitarianism? Is it better to act selfishly, because we won\u2019t don\u2019t have perfect information? Or isn\u2019t rather the best choice a meta-utilitarian approach, where we just do the best we can<\/a> with the information we have?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I argue for the latter of course. We need to make choices on how much we can afford to reflect<\/a> on the consequences of our actions, our motivations and the psychological effects that factor into our decisions. We need to make choices on how much information we can afford to gather before taking action. In every decision, we make this trade-off.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moreover, just like we need to find a good balance between instant and delayed gratification<\/a>, we need to find a sustainable approach to meta-utilitarianism in order to not overdiscipline ourselves. If we do not want to burn out, we need to account for the fact that we need self-maintenance, for example, by occasionally doing something out of intrinsic motivation<\/a>, regardless of the optimisation of the consequences of our decision making.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Meta-)Utilitarianism & Agility<\/strong><\/u><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Finally, I argue that meta-utilitarianism is closely related to the value maximisation principle of the Agile mindset<\/a>. Naturally, an agile organisation likely focusses on business value, however, there is an increasing awareness that customer value maximisation is not unrelated to employee satisfaction and sustainable (product) development. (Meta-)utilitarianism, just like Agile, is about an efficient & effective way to use resources to have the most suitable & sustainable outcome for everybody involved \u2013 the employees, customers and the environment. And just like (Meta-)utilitarianism, the Agile mindset involves \u201csystems thinking<\/a>\u201d- a holistic\/ systemic view on the situation we are facing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To close this philosophy article off with some fun, here are two more modified Trolley Problems for you:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a>
Source<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a>
Source<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
Some more modified Trolley Problems \u2013 for the fun of thought experiments \ud83d\ude42<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

What values govern your decisions? Do you take the consequences of your actions into account? Your feelings? The value your action brings to others? Does the meta-utilitarian idea resonate with you? I am curious to hear your reflections on this topic<\/a>!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Written by Julia Heuritsch | Last edited: 25th May 2023<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Transcending the tension between Consequentialism and the Categorical Imperative<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"content-type":""},"categories":[5,6,36,8,10],"tags":[16,23,31,17],"yoast_head":"\nMeta-Utilitarianism: A holistic view on maximising value | I can be me Blog - Julia Heuritsch<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Meta-utilitarianism holds that the most ethical choice is the one that will produce the greatest good (value\/utility) for the greatest impact on people and the environment.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/2023\/04\/28\/meta-utilitarianism-a-holistic-view-on-maximising-value\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Meta-Utilitarianism: A holistic view on maximising value | I can be me Blog - Julia Heuritsch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Meta-utilitarianism holds that the most ethical choice is the one that will produce the greatest good (value\/utility) for the greatest impact on people and the environment.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/2023\/04\/28\/meta-utilitarianism-a-holistic-view-on-maximising-value\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"I can be me\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-04-28T13:09:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-05-25T16:01:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/Strong-Community-Stephen-Bittel.png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Julia Heuritsch\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Julia Heuritsch\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/\",\"name\":\"I can be me\",\"description\":\"#Saywhatis!\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/2023\/04\/28\/meta-utilitarianism-a-holistic-view-on-maximising-value\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/Strong-Community-Stephen-Bittel.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/Strong-Community-Stephen-Bittel.png\",\"width\":977,\"height\":720},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/2023\/04\/28\/meta-utilitarianism-a-holistic-view-on-maximising-value\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/2023\/04\/28\/meta-utilitarianism-a-holistic-view-on-maximising-value\/\",\"name\":\"Meta-Utilitarianism: A holistic view on maximising value | I can be me Blog - Julia Heuritsch\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/2023\/04\/28\/meta-utilitarianism-a-holistic-view-on-maximising-value\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-04-28T13:09:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-05-25T16:01:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/#\/schema\/person\/541227941ec236a1d8facf03e358250b\"},\"description\":\"Meta-utilitarianism holds that the most ethical choice is the one that will produce the greatest good (value\/utility) for the greatest impact on people and the environment.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/2023\/04\/28\/meta-utilitarianism-a-holistic-view-on-maximising-value\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/2023\/04\/28\/meta-utilitarianism-a-holistic-view-on-maximising-value\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/2023\/04\/28\/meta-utilitarianism-a-holistic-view-on-maximising-value\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Meta-Utilitarianism: A holistic view on maximising value\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/#\/schema\/person\/541227941ec236a1d8facf03e358250b\",\"name\":\"Julia Heuritsch\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/df3d45a61d596b7bcd33d0b718d3c152?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/df3d45a61d596b7bcd33d0b718d3c152?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Julia Heuritsch\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/author\/admin1076\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Meta-Utilitarianism: A holistic view on maximising value | I can be me Blog - Julia Heuritsch","description":"Meta-utilitarianism holds that the most ethical choice is the one that will produce the greatest good (value\/utility) for the greatest impact on people and the environment.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/2023\/04\/28\/meta-utilitarianism-a-holistic-view-on-maximising-value\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Meta-Utilitarianism: A holistic view on maximising value | I can be me Blog - Julia Heuritsch","og_description":"Meta-utilitarianism holds that the most ethical choice is the one that will produce the greatest good (value\/utility) for the greatest impact on people and the environment.","og_url":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/2023\/04\/28\/meta-utilitarianism-a-holistic-view-on-maximising-value\/","og_site_name":"I can be me","article_published_time":"2023-04-28T13:09:20+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-05-25T16:01:37+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/Strong-Community-Stephen-Bittel.png"}],"author":"Julia Heuritsch","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Julia Heuritsch","Estimated reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/#website","url":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/","name":"I can be me","description":"#Saywhatis!","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/2023\/04\/28\/meta-utilitarianism-a-holistic-view-on-maximising-value\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/Strong-Community-Stephen-Bittel.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/Strong-Community-Stephen-Bittel.png","width":977,"height":720},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/2023\/04\/28\/meta-utilitarianism-a-holistic-view-on-maximising-value\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/2023\/04\/28\/meta-utilitarianism-a-holistic-view-on-maximising-value\/","name":"Meta-Utilitarianism: A holistic view on maximising value | I can be me Blog - Julia Heuritsch","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/2023\/04\/28\/meta-utilitarianism-a-holistic-view-on-maximising-value\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2023-04-28T13:09:20+00:00","dateModified":"2023-05-25T16:01:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/#\/schema\/person\/541227941ec236a1d8facf03e358250b"},"description":"Meta-utilitarianism holds that the most ethical choice is the one that will produce the greatest good (value\/utility) for the greatest impact on people and the environment.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/2023\/04\/28\/meta-utilitarianism-a-holistic-view-on-maximising-value\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/2023\/04\/28\/meta-utilitarianism-a-holistic-view-on-maximising-value\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/2023\/04\/28\/meta-utilitarianism-a-holistic-view-on-maximising-value\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Meta-Utilitarianism: A holistic view on maximising value"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/#\/schema\/person\/541227941ec236a1d8facf03e358250b","name":"Julia Heuritsch","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/df3d45a61d596b7bcd33d0b718d3c152?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/df3d45a61d596b7bcd33d0b718d3c152?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Julia Heuritsch"},"url":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/author\/admin1076\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3944"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3944"}],"version-history":[{"count":30,"href":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3944\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3998,"href":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3944\/revisions\/3998"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3944"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3944"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icanbeme.space\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3944"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}